greatest military strategists

Greatest Military Strategists - Here's what you need to know: A thinker who feels the truth of war meets a doctor who is reluctant to examine his experiences.

Pitting military strategists against each other is a slippery slope. Besides the difference in ideas - the historical period they live in, the state of martial technology in their life, the warm-up method then in vogue - there is an important different. Some experts are experts; others are only theoretical.

Greatest Military Strategists

So how do you judge a soldier like, say, General Ulysses S. Grant—a champion whose campaign for battle was exposed to Carl von Clausewitz's "law of continuity" - against Clausewitz, a soldier with achievements as a man. ? against an indifferent Does the text form the thoughts and actions of today?

Of The Greatest Medieval Military Leaders

Oddly enough, many seem like regular workers who start writing their ideas after being defeated, boxed in, or both. Sometimes failure clears the mind. It is difficult to make their ideas conflict. In fact, at the end of the day, you should side with the teachers over the writers. They mine the historical record—the record of the actions of the great leader—to find the blueprint of the idea. Napoleon and Frederick the Great in Clausewitz's War. Sir Horatio Nelson is the face of Alfred Thayer Mahan's sea power theory. Thucydides has Pericles, Alcibiades, Brasidas, Lysander and many others. Experts provide information to teachers for analysis and referral.

You need workers and thinkers to make good intentions, but in the end a thinker with a realistic view of the battlefield trumps a doctor with few skills to analyze their experiences, draw conclusions, and record results. That's why speakers, not leaders, top my "Five Greatest Soldiers in History" list. The personal classification of experts can include statesmen from Julius Caesar to Nathanael Greene to Abraham Lincoln. With that note, let's go!

You have to respect the writer who himself is lost to the legacy, but his writings are important. As Lawrence Freedman notes, the Trojan War chronicler was one of the first to explore two important concepts in the philosophy of war: biê, meaning brute force used in face-to-face encounters sale, and mêtis, meaning craft, cunning, and subterfuge. It is common to describe biê as an important factor in western warfare. And indeed, over the centuries, countless Western soldiers and theorists have expressed discomfort with this seemingly unnecessary approach.

However, Homer reminds posterity that Europe has its own passing and good practices. This is not the state of Sun Tzu and his fellow Asians. Freedman sees Achilles as the face of biê, the Iliad is a direct example. The Trickster is the face of Odysseus mêtis, based on the infidel content of Homer's Odyssey. When you put things together, the poet seems to conclude that both views are important, but that biê, used by leaders with a gift for mêtis, is the best. Odysseus did better than Achilles. It is a word that deserves to be revisited in the millennium.

Cyrus The Great Print Poster Famous Ancient Military Strategist First Persian Empire Canvas Painting Wall Art Decor

We return to the Aegean world for the four greatest warriors in history. Many Thucydides would be proud of the place on this list, and I would agree if this is a list of experts. But the treatment of ships and spears is not military enough to be a military strategy. Even the Athenian chronicler did not explain his ideas with the accuracy of Wylie, Corbett or Clausewitz. However, it is all there in Thucydides' History: land power battle against sea power, the importance of money in warming, the necessity of create and destroy friendly relations with enemies, including the opening of a second theater or operation, and many more. A job for every occasion.

Another dead white man! And yet I am lying here ... or, charitably, revealing some of my mêtis. Admiral Wylie represented non-Western scholars such as Sun Tzu and Mao Zedong, who were valued for their attention, as well as the British B.H. Liddell Hart, 20th century Englishman. The prophet of the wrong vision of the 20th century. Wylie was a kind of meta-trategist, using the ideas of others to form a unified theory of philosophy. He breaks down the war into land, sea, air and Maoist schools of thought, before concluding that Liddell Hart's big idea - the introduction - is the idea that includes them. everyone. Wylie's compact packaging is a tour de force. When faced with difficult questions, you might want me, as a military expert, to go to Mahan first. no Give me Wylie, who served on the Naval War College faculty in the 1950s, over Mahan, an NWC veteran of the 1880s and 1890s, any day.

Clausewitz enters the briny theme in Corbett's writings. The British scientist wrote about the world's sea power - the Royal Navy then, the US Navy now - but any naval power, strong or weak, can push his ideas into action work Nine times out of ten he preaches the Mahanian philosophy - that military determination is the way to victory at sea - right. He then spends most of his book reviewing the remaining tithes. Conclusion: The power of the sea can be a limited war to create conditions on land, and even the strong will be weak in certain times and places. To learn how the weak can be uplifted—and victorious from the conflict that lies between peace and all-out war—ask Sir Julian.

The great Clausewitz is known for his interest in the relationship between politics and war, civil and military, see military strategy. The purpose of war is to use combat and unity to advance. Consider the extensive study of the Napoleonic battle-his vision through fog and smoke, watching the war machine with friction and dark passion- and you will get the idea. There is a reason that military education, Western or Eastern, begins with Clausewitz. And there is a reason why Asian theorists like Mao included the Prussian in their thinking about politics and war. This is because it refers to a universal theory and grammar of conflict. This deserves numero uno on my list.

World ' S Greatest Strategist . The Polish Army Chief Who , According To Many Continental Writers On Military

Now, many of you will argue about who made my list, who left it, and who was put in order. Nice! Get out there, immerse yourself in the work of philosophy and make your own list of authors. The purpose of your skill is important. But the journey is where you will find insight, Jamie was born out of a desire to share fascinating, dark and strange events. He has been a guest speaker on many national radio and television programs and is a five-time author.

This list ranks the military based on their skill in achieving success in the field; history; win/loss record, etc. This list is difficult to write in detail, and it leaves out a few military masters who deserve to be mentioned. So, there are many praises at the end.

The entire Mongol Empire, at its peak, covered about 12.7 million square kilometers, or 22% of the total land area of ​​the world. The tactics that made such conquests can be traced back to Genghis, the founder of the Ottoman Empire. and the first Khan. Born Borjigin Temujin, he created a variety of attacks, shooting guns: his best archers were trained not to shoot, but to shoot accurately while riding a horse. They can shoot right behind the horse at full gallop. There was no military force in the world at that time that could fight this army, and all the Mongols were quickly defeated.

Genghis' legacy is cemented with the conquest of Khwarezmia, which is most of modern Iran, as well as parts of Afghanistan, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, and Kazakhstan. Genghis first honored the leader, Ala ad-Din Muhammad II, as another conqueror, but when Genghis sent an ambassador to trade with Ala ad-Din, the latter killed the ambassador and Send the remaining haircut for criticism. Genghis Khan's First Rule: Don't insult Genghis Khan.

Top 21 Faces Of The Gulf War

He invaded Khwarezmia with 200,000 men, half as many mounted archers, and divided his army into smaller forces designed to conquer more territory more quickly. In military schools, this is always recommended, but Genghis scholars noted that Allah ad-din was waiting with the defense of the forts, which suited Genghis' need for room for maneuver. His army surrounded the cities of Samarkand, Urgenche and Bukhara, and destroyed them all, one after another. On the third day of the siege of Burkhara, the Turkish army decided that they did not have enough food and water to fight Genghis, so they led an army of 20,000 soldiers and soldiers, who had attacked the open steppe outside the city. Genghis's army killed them, to the last man.

Then after 2 weeks he ended the siege, killed the Turkish soldiers who were still alive, sent the young people into slavery and killed all the people, men and women who did not work well. Seeing that his attempts to free himself from the Turkish forces had failed, Genghis attacked Samarkand, whose army sent 50,000 veterans against Genghis's army. so he feigned to slowly withdraw. It's a simple plot that works brilliantly. His men retaliated by flanking the two

Greatest military strategies, greatest military battles, greatest military quotes, greatest military blunders, great military strategists, greatest military leaders, greatest military tacticians, famous military strategists, greatest military strategists in history, greatest strategists, military strategists, history's greatest military leaders